Thursday, April 15, 2010

Changing the Name of a University 2.0

When I started at UHD, other presidents told me that I was walking into a mine field. We'd have to make cuts, raise tuition, raise admission standards, and change the university's name--oh, and by the way, you have to do all of that in your first year. One friend told me, it's like walking into a Tsunami knowing its going to hit real soon.

Well, I came anyway. And, I'm glad I did. The University of Houston-Downtown is a great place. It has dedicated faculty and staff, devoted alumni, good support from the business community and local legislators, and has really dedicated students. Still, changing the name of a university is a very hard thing to do.

The last time it was tried there was a great deal of frustration on everybody's part. But, name change was already under way. The Board of Regents made a decision to change the name of UHD nearly two years ago, so now, it's time to decide what that new name will be.

When I arrived, work on an RFP was under way and soon a firm, STAMATS, was identified to work with us on the name change. I found them to be knowledgeable and experienced, as their focus is higher education. The firm held focus groups with students, faculty, staff, and alumni. Together, we met with key legislators, the UH system chancellor, and the chairman of the Board of regents. Then, they conducted online surveys of prospective students, current students, faculty, staff, and alumni.

On April 14th, they presented their results to the campus with recommendations for two possible names. We held several public meetings presenting the survey results, allowing everyone to voice their feelings--good, bad, or indifferent. I was truly impressed by excellent presentations, the research findings, the recommendations, and the reaction of the campus--which was basically supportive, but with lots of questions and comments. The Chairman of the Regents, Welcome Wilson, attended four meetings over two days and answered questions.

The presentations are online at this page.  STAMAT's findings underscored reasons why UHD should change its name. First, there is a lot of confusion about UHD. Students, employers, and donors confuse the University of Houston-Downtown with the University of Houston. Students apply to one university and show up at the other. They start classes at one university only to find out the major they want is at the other. Donors will tell deans or even the president of UHD, "We gave already this year," (meaning they gave to UH, not UHD). Employers say my assistant is a student at UH, when they actually are a student at UHD. This week a UHD faculty was quoted on a local television station, but identified as a faculty member at the University of Houston. Earlier a UHD student spoke at the White House and several times corrected the television interviewer, who repeatedly introduced her as a student from the University of Houston.

The confusion is natural. Unlike most systems that have universities in different cities, the University of Houston System has four campuses within a forty-mile radius. UH and UHD are just a few miles away from each other and adjuncts often teach at both universities. So, changing our name will help both institutions.

Second, a surprising number of people in Houston do not know of UHD and many think UHD is a branch campus of UH. They don't realize that it is a separately-accredited university. A survey of Houston residents conducted two years ago found that only a very small portion of respondents listed UHD, when asked to name four-year universities that serve Houston. Those that did name UHD thought it was a branch campus of UH. STAMATS found that just under 50% of prospective students surveyed thought UHD is a branch of UH. More surprisingly, nearly one-third of alumni and currently enrolled UHD students who participated in the survey thought UHD is a branch of UH. Worse, even some UHD faculty and staff made that same mistake, although these were mainly part-time faculty and staff.

Third, UHD is located downtown and serves Houston, but the majority of its students come from outside downtown. In fact, only 15% of students live within the inner loop (inside the 610 loop) and nearly half live out of the 8 Beltway. Moreover, we have learning centers in other parts of Houston and are opening a learning center in the Northwest up off 249 at the old HP Center (now Lone Star College's University Park).

Focus groups and survey results emphasized several important qualities of UHD: small classes, its location to the downtown and nearby employers, its diversity, and the fact it is interconnected to the city. These are important elements of what makes UHD distinct and starting point for branding, as we begin to brand the university.

Given all these reasons a name change makes sense, but one that retains a clear identification with Houston and the University of Houston System. STAMATS recommended two names, which are actually variants of each other: City University and Houston City University. Whichever name is ultimately selected, the name would include a tag, "A UH System University" or "Part of the University of Houston System."

There are very good reasons for either name. Clearly, UHD serves the city and surrounding environments and we get most of our students from Houston and the surrounding area. As one alumnus observed during the focus groups, "The school is in the city, but more importantly, the city is in the school."

The proposed names permit the university to tie itself to Houston even more clearly.  After all, as Houston grows so will our university.  The dialog and interaction was very good. Everyone had a chance to react and voice their opinion. So, what are the next steps? We will hold more focus groups, hold a straw poll to see support for one name or the other, and report our findings to the Board of Regents.

The Regents will then vote on the names and select a new name for the university. Finally, the legislature must approve the new name, which will only occur if the campus community rallies behind the new name.

So, there's much work to be done. But, we took an important step forward. Now, the discussions begin.

19 comments:

  1. Not that you opened this up for suggestions, but has "Houston University" been on the table?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually, last year, roughly 90 names were kicked around for consideration. I believe Houston University was one of those eliminated because of its similarity with the University of Houston. Others may know for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I still think Houston University is a better choice than Houston City University or City University. City University begs the question of what city and houston city university will be like hey we know houston is a city. Houston University keeps the brand of the city without putting city in the name. I was for the name change orginally but now with these two names not so much, yes the names may have a great impact in the future but we are in the here and now not the future we have to worry about today and let tomorrow happen. I just don't understand why we paid all the money to STATMATS for them to come up with something as generic as this. Not to mention all the money we have to put in after the name change, not only do we have to reprint some much UHD things like signs and new glass doors, and business cards and so on, not to mention Metro will have to spend millions of dollars or expect us to furnish the money to reprint bus schedules and plaques for the train stations. which is about to get very costy with the north bound expansion and the addition of other rail lines.

    I think the better thing to do is to work on informing the public through the media and other sources that UHD is NOT UH. Our Biggest tool is the fact UH is a Research Institution while we focus on Academics. Why is it we have to change our name and UHCL or UHV do not.

    I also would like to share the folowing link to let you see what the residents of our fair city think, about the names and the name change in general in fact im sure most of these are students and staff members or their family's

    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6958330.html

    Kind Regards,

    Matthew Vetter

    ReplyDelete
  4. As an Alumni, I feel that if you paid a consulting firm for those names, then you should definately ask for a refund... Those names do not reflect the great city that we live in or the university... I just feel that a little more though and effort should have been applied. Some on on a news site suggested Bayou City University.... Food for thought!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Maybe more time, money and elbow grease should have been spent on the public affairs and marketing efforts of the university. The reason there is so much confusion around the name and affiliations is because the message(ing) wasn't clear. I still think UH-D should've focused more on "making the best out of our name" and engaged its faculty and student resources (i.e. Marketing Majors, Communication Studies Majors, Professional Writing, etc.) making it a never ending marketing campaign, a graduating requirement; to strengthen the UH-D brand. But that's just my $.02.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank..for all the concern and work you walked into our school.There is one thing I'm proud of and I will always be is I'm a senior at the University of Houston Downtown and that is what made me fall in love and attend this college.On the side of people being confused is just them but in reality UHD is just like clear lake and the rest of the system.On the other hand as a soon to be almni of UHD I'm proud that My diploma will bear THE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON GRADUATE CLASS OF 2010.Thank u and keep UHD stand out.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Although the two names suggested have the word 'university', they sound too much like a community college or a junior college. I wasn't a student at UHD last year, so I'm not familiar with the 90 names that were considered, but with so much time and money having been spent on consultants and filling out surveys there had to be better names on the list. How were the two names selected for the short list?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Both names are awful...there has got to be a better names to choose from. Maybe open up a discussion board or something where the students can suggest possible names and everyone can vote.

    The students should have a voice...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Can you please put a "don't like either" choice on your survey gadget? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  10. To me the two choices sound like a community college. If I had to throw a name out there, I would say--Allen's Landing University (sounds more prestigious than City University or Houston City University)or UH-At Allen's Landing. UH-D is sitting on the birthplace of Houston, Allen's Landing. If Allen's Landing was the birthplace to this great city, why not have Allen's Landing University be where our degrees are created so our careers begin...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Excellent post Dr. Flores. I agree with the name change. If it has to be one of the two presented by STAMATS, then I would rally behind Houston City University as the new name for UHD. Please continue to communicate this message to various constituents until they understand why it is important for UHD to have a new name.

    Another good name for UHD would be Houston A&I University. That name would fit very well with the university's mission and programs, and create a distinct identity. The "A&I" would stand for Arts and Industries. UHD is known for providing a well rounded liberal arts education and preparing people for jobs in industries with cutting edge programs in the sciences, technology and business. The university’s location is located in the heart of Houston’s industry base with Downtown and the Port of Houston and Houston Ship Channel nearby. In addition, the One Main Building was formerly the Merchants and Manufacturers Building where major commerce activities took place in the early days. All these qualities of UHD and history of the area can be summarized in the name Houston A&I University.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is a very informative summary of why the name needs to be changed. I have been interested in having a name that includes City University in some way from the beginning -- to me, comparing us to City University of New York and City University London are very apt. I could go with either name, City University or Houston City University, with great pride.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It's really sad to see that a publicly funded university that is laying people off and having faculty and staff undertake furloughs is spending time and money on such an expensive issue. I'm a disappointed UH alum.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I agree with Airline, but to us it will always be UHD.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I understand the need for a name change, it's the choices that are in need of re-thinking. They are terrible.

    ReplyDelete
  16. With all do respect Sir, I think this whole name change thing is a big mistake. First, no one even informed the student body about this issue. Second, the names selected are absolutely horrendous. Third, if U of H main is so concerned about name confusion, they are more than welcome to change their name. This is a complete slap in the face. I take pride in this school. Our name should reflect that. I vote nay! I see your poll conveniently forgets to mention whether we disapprove of both names. What a pity.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Dr. Flores, I agree with the name change but like some of my fellow classmates, I disagree with the names that are on the table. It is sad to admit to people that after all the money that was wasted on research on name changes, these two choices is what it boils down to. I think that the name confusion is a ridiculous excuse as well. I dont understand why the other Universities of Houston don't have to change their names also. The names that are chosen seem to be a joke and I take pride of this school. I have been here for four years and I love the faculty and the ambience. It would be sad to see everyone ashamed of this school because of these name changes. I agree with a comment that said that they sound like a community college, as students we deserve better than that. Why was this issue not brought up in the beginning of the semester? Why could you not get the students involved earlier in the year so we could have our voices heard? Dr. Flores I really hope that you re think these choices and you give us a name we could be proud of.

    ReplyDelete
  18. It looks like the majority of these posts are all together apposed to the name change. And every student I speak too in my department does not like the name change idea at all. So why haven’t our voices been heard? When I graduate and if I have to put on my resume Houston City University or City University, wont my potential employer most likely ask “what university it that?” or “never heard of that one”. How can I compete with other graduates with more prestigious names on there resumes? Looks like the money they spent on research should have been put into more useful school programs. This will be the first time that I may actually not be proud to be at this University.

    ReplyDelete